just a reminder about RIPA, perhaps Rolands officer contacts might be of some use getting good solid advice/feedback.
i wonder what their personal view of being intercepted is too, if they have an ISP phorming them in the office or at home.
the Stanford case being the prosecution under RIPA and the subsequent loss of appeal by the ISP Executive involved case law as per Alexander and my finding earlyer in this thread so the board and executive managers can be Prosecuted, dont forget that.
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/pi...il/084400.html
"
Police, Home Office, and Phorm
Roland Perry ukcrypto at chiark.greenend.org.uk
Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:42:42 +0100
Previous message: Police, Home Office, and Phorm
Next message: Police, Home Office, and Phorm
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <
MBELJPEGAMOKEHHLKHHOMEKACCAA.pjohn at blueyonder.co.uk>, Pete
John <pjohn at blueyonder.co.uk> writes
>The Police declined to investigate, and told me responsibility
>for enforcing RIPA belongs to the Home Office.
The police investigated the Stanford case (I know some of the officers
involved).
Perhaps the police you talked to are confused, and think your complaint
relates to the oversight of Pt1 Ch2 (as experienced by the police),
which isn't the Home Office either (but the Interception Commissioner).
--
Roland Perry