Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
So the tweet says something bad will definitely happen without any evidence and previous circumstances suggest it will not. It's absolutely correct to challenge this.
If someone tweeted today that There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that tomorrow in Birmingham the weather will be anything less than a hurricane - I would definitely challenge this as well.
|
It still would be an opinion, not something that could be disproved.
There is more than enough evidence of rigged postal voting in the UK and the US. When you make it wholesale postal voting, as is the plan, that increases the scope for rigging the vote. That is all undeniable.
Just because there is little evidence of something, doesn't mean it isn't happening on a massive scale. You can't possibly check millions of voters AFTER the vote, to check that their vote was valid. If somebody attempts or commits fraud on your bank account, you would only notice AFTER the event. People don't see AFTER the vote, how their voted was counted.
In the big Birmingham warehouse case in the UK, if witnesses hadn't spotted them carrying large bags from their campaign offices, the police wouldn't have raided the warehouse, and nobody would have been the wiser. Unless somebody notices something odd, it goes unnoticed. Eg Dr Harold Shipman was responsible for more than 250 murders before anybody took notice. If he hadn't carried out those actions which brought attention, he would've been able to continue. When a crime is unnoticeable, it can easily be gotten away with, and all without proof it ever happened.