Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramrod
I think he's sober.
---------- Post added at 19:54 ---------- Previous post was at 19:46 ----------
What are you saying?  |
You were the one posing similar links about Sweden.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
I think he's saying he doesn't understand that this thread is about the Asian sex gangs that keep showing up in court.
|
The "Asian" sex gangs pimped the victims around to
others. Those others commit rape but are not part of the gang, but they ARE part of the criminal offences connected to the gangs. Without them what would the gangs do?
If when coming up with a ratio of offenders by group, one grouping has a disproportionate number of people who can't offend, then the ratio will be wrong. IE if a ratio of 8 to 1 is given and the 1 side of the equation has very young boys eg 5 year old, and very old eg 90 years old. then the proportion in that side is lower, making the real ratio for the 8x side much higher. Bit like trying to compare something linked to driving, when one side includes male and female drivers, but the other only includes male drivers.
Eg NB The actual numbers do not matter. 2,000 of a group of 1million, then a 8x ratio would give 800 for a population of 50,000. If then the group of 1 million should have half excluded to give comparable figures, then the ratio DOUBLES to 16x. 8x is scary enough, but potentially higher should be even scarier.
It cannot be denied that a disproportionate number of asylum seekers are not from the 5 year old or 90 year old sections. It may well be that they been already excluded when coming up with the 8x figure but I'm not aware of anything in either direction.