Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
We were discussing/disagreeing on the Vienna Convention, and unilateral/bilateral termination of Treaties, not Article 50...
Hope this helps...
|
Not really. It certainly doesn’t help you.
Article 50 is the mechanism in the “Treaty” of Lisbon. Which is a Treaty, is it not? To terminate membership
In the discussion Nomadking claimed the Backstop was illegal because it prevented the unilateral Withdrawl from an agreement. I.e. A.50 Treaty of Lisbon.
You then went off about the Vienna convention, which quite simply doesn’t apply in this instance because A.50 exists in the Treaty of Lisbon for this very purpose.
The backstop isn’t illegal, because it is not binding and we can choose to ignore it if we so wish. But the question over whether agreement of us leaving or not has been answered and is not in question.
So next time you try to put an amusing Gif on a post, make sure you fully understand what it is you’re trying to take the piss out of, or you may look a bit thick.
---------- Post added at 07:54 ---------- Previous post was at 07:51 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
lol, a dangerous question to ask!
|
Not to Hugh it isn’t.