[BenMcr]

Originally Posted by nomadking

He said that the plans would lead to substantial fraud. That is an opinion. It cannot be treated as a statement of fact that has to be proved one way or the other, because it has yet to happen one way or the other.

That's not the case for all the times he has mentioned it though - he's treated it as a fact in both tweets and replies i.e 'has' or 'does', not 'will' or 'would'.

He even set up a voter fraud commission which has to close as it turned into a huge fishing exercise and couldn't show an widespread rigging of any type of voting.