Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
If someone murdered over a crime of passion, a fit of pique or you were in a gang or criminal fraternity etc, you know what I mean. I believe there is a chance of rehabilitation.
But this guy raped two “children” and then murdered them.
I don’t think you should ever see the outside of a prison cell for that kind of crime.
There’s lots of casual low level offenders in prison taking up time and resources that are not really a danger to society and for who prison does not help them or us and then there’s people like him the world is a better place with him locked away.
I don’t believe in the death penalty but for the real evil *******s, they should stay locked up.
|
Raped and killed children in two separate incidents three years apart, I think that's significant
---------- Post added at 14:01 ---------- Previous post was at 13:56 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
That "law" you talk about is simply that they are allowed to make a judgement as to whether it's safe to release him. There is no law that said they had to automatically release him.
Strangely enough the thing that might deter him from reoffending, is DNA evidence.
|
Yes and that's the law they were following, you really will argue over nothing, back on ignore you go