View Single Post
Old 25-03-2020, 21:44   #1325
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,364
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K View Post
It's an irrelevant number anyway given the randomness of testing. Unfortunately deaths is the only number we can rely on.

---------- Post added at 21:34 ---------- Previous post was at 21:33 ----------



Means they are testing more? Who can say.
While nobody accepts it's an accurate figure (thanks to the decision not to test) there's still value in the data. Who has it and where will drive healthcare decision making in the coming weeks. It's better to know than to be oblivious to where the trouble spots will come.

Obviously, genuine success comes when in a like for like period with a similar number of tests and similar testing policy the number of new infections decreases. Something we will hopefully see in the next 14 to 21 days.

Last edited by jfman; 25-03-2020 at 21:47.
jfman is offline