Quote:
Originally Posted by coulsontom
That happens when the competition is not selling the same thing. ESPN was selling crap games, BT have 18x best games.
With phones, and gas and electric, it's a mess and prices are constantly changing confusing the customer, who don't know what the best deal is. Government needs to regulate better.
But Sky wouldn't be able to afford to charge what they charge now if BT charged significantly less with 50% of the games.
|
The current situation forced on us by Europe costs the user more end of , when Sky had all the games you got a Sky Sports sub and the option to add 50 games via Prem Plus for £50 which is certainly cheaper than £15 per month granted ESPN & BT also show other sport as well.
I'm not suggesting that Sky should be granted a monopoly on football in my opinion the best solution for us the customer would be for the Premier league to have their own channel and sell their content on each platform at the same price , much fairer everybody gets HD/3D.