Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
(sigh) your statement implied that i had.
Let's not get into an argument on semantics or we will be hear until god knows when 
If you choose to believe that it's acceptable to judge situations on past occurrences without at least some knowledge of the present situation. then that's your choice. personally I think it's wrong.
---------- Post added at 13:02 ---------- Previous post was at 12:56 ----------
Perfectly,
if people want to make assumptions that a certain race or religions then it has to be all crimes committed by all races or religions over the entire recorded history.
That's the only way to get a true result. Anything else is just a skewed data set.
Which of course will suit some in society.....
'We are talking about todays’ phenomena of a particular kind.' which people then seek to generalize against certain races or religions. a perfect example of skewing the data to fit the requirements  |
Ok but I can’t be held responsible for you misreading what I have clearly said. After all, the words are right there.
You think it’s wrong? Cool, I think it’s ok.