Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
No, the difference is that there is no investment and the service is poorly run. Obviously, you are not old enough to appreciate just how bad our national rail service was, and the remarkable transformation that took place when it was nationalised.
You may think it's not well run now, but you should take a look at the problems we had in the past!
|
Remarkable transformation? Where?
Underinvestment is the first play of the privatisation handbook. It's hardly surprising that the Conservatives let it rot before saying the best option was to sell it. Same goes for the NHS now.
The alternative is to make people pay via the tax system. Pay over the counter, pay through tax, either way you pay. There's no philanthropic medical insurance providers out there, just as there aren't with train operators.
---------- Post added at 19:42 ---------- Previous post was at 19:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
It is one of the first steps of Corbyn's Marxist agenda.
|
You've been asked to evidence that it's a Marxist agenda and had your original post amended for failing to do so.