View Single Post
Old 13-10-2019, 14:00   #2411
jfman
Architect of Ideas
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,232
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
jfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronzejfman is cast in bronze
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.

You still haven't demonstrated that incorrectly refusing PIP claims and losing 70% of appeals reduces said fraud. All it does is increase the administrative burden and cost of the application process.

It's also unclear what, if any, evidence the DWP used in making the decisions mentioned above. Some of them will almost certainly have gamed the entirely inadequate PIP/ESA assessment process.

The reality is it has little credibility at tribunal, making it easier for fraudsters not harder. The copy and paste private sector reports carry little weight in the absence of any genuine insight into the person being assessed.

Not acting aggressively to the assessor and adequate eye contact is no measure of a whole raft of mental health issues. Yet the DWP will copy and paste it over and over.
jfman is offline   Reply With Quote