View Single Post
Old 13-04-2008, 06:02   #27
popper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,270
popper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze array
popper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze arraypopper has a bronze array
Re: Phorm Public Meeting - Official Thread

Quote:
Simon Davies,MD, 80/20 Thinking Ltd said:
"Seeking the balance of public opinion is a road to bedlam, and is subordinate to the more arduous task of sorting out the facts."
Quote:
As a privacy activist I never based my actions on whether the majority of the population went along with me (and most don't on such issues as CCTV or expansion of police powers) but I continue regardless to work through process and principle.

That approach will be reflected at this meeting.
thats an interesting point of view Simon, but it seems against the founding principles of the www.ico.gov.uk and it's PIA documents.

does the ICO or the EU Commisioners office for that matter, consider their official documents subordinate to anything else relating to the UK/EU privacy domain/facts?

does or can a private companys collected facts correlate with the Govt and the peoples effected facts!...

for the late comers to the CF ISP/Phorm threads, the rules that need to be followed for that Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) are here.
http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documen...l/1-intro.html

the main reason this meeting is taking place, is for you and your individual stakeholders ICO PIA rules here it seems.
http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documen...preparing.html
popper is offline   Reply With Quote