Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
He has admitted that he was there, but not that it was a party, which is the essential issue here.
Why would I be disappointed that the PM has answered the question?
Let’s now see what the inquiry concludes so we have all the facts and then we can make a sensible judgement.
We need answers to questions about that invitation to the event, whether there was any retraction and clarification of that, and what actually happened at the event.
I’m sure you can hold it together for another few days so you can speak on this with some credibility. Making judgements based on allegations without having the submission from the other side is never a wise move.
|
You're on good form today.
If the bloke running the show can't tell the difference between a work meeting and an after work drinks session then it really does look like the Conservative's need an injection of some new genes in what looks like a pretty small and getting smaller pool (pun intended).
Surely you're disappointed he answered the question because only yesterday you were telling us he wasn't answering because he was tacking the piss out of and pulling the pud of the opposition to sucker them in to the trap he had set.
So if our opinion is contrary to yours we need to wait for the facts before we express our disgust in the actions of the lying snake oil salesman while you don't need to wait for the facts to shout his innocence from the rooftops.