Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Wow, “at least” three! I mean based on that.....well, you only have look........at least three. Speaks volumes doesn’t it?
|
Exactly, I didn't look and remembered three of the top of my head, of a tiny little site like this, with even tinier numbers replying to the thread and nice attempt to move the goal posts, it was said no one had nothing new, well they have for a start
Quote:
|
That just highlights that there are ignorant and lazy people out there, it doesn’t prove that there wasn’t enough information available. There was plenty.
|
No there wasn't, I asked questions on here back then that still haven't been answered, some have only been answered due to the passage of time which hardly equates to information having been out there
Quote:
I respect your decision, but my only issue is with the word “reluctantly”? That’s like saying I loved somebody but I reluctantly dumped him as although I loved him, I didn’t love him enough to find out enough about him.
Or even worse it’s like saying I reluctantly married someone, because I didn’t do the homework.
The information was there, available for all.
|
Your analogy is ridiculous and not worth commenting on