Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11
No hence the part of the quote in bold
The point we made was should that happen it will just invest the money saved which would be a tidy sum into its own content.
Don't forget the removal of third party content will impact all the streamers also. 
Disney's ownership of Hulu could see vast amounts of third party content removed in the future as will the likes of Netflix and Amazon. |
But I agree with the bit in bold! I am not arguing against that.
Nor am I arguing against your point that Sky would have to invest in its own programming faced with the loss of third party content.
I myself have pointed out that Netflix will lose its Disney content.
So we agree on all points, then. So why are we arguing?:
---------- Post added at 18:55 ---------- Previous post was at 18:51 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I don’t need to back up my analysis with opinion pieces from digital marketing companies. I don’t agree “anyone” could naturally reach the same conclusions at all. In fact, I think most unbiased observers would agree with me that Sky/Comcast as an incumbent in many markets will be well placed to adapt to the future whatever it holds.
|
Good luck with that, then.