Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
Have to agree completely there.
PR spin is not required, and adds no value. No spin is required to convey the truth.
Certainly more press coverage would be welcome, but whenever the press have been approached they've been reluctant to cover this for reasons we can only speculate about.
With the exception of Chris Williams at The Register, who deserves a nomination for a journalism award, after this sorry episode is over.
No worry, and you say Rob, I'm in this for as long as it takes.
Pete.
|
Agreed twice (Blazing Saddles quote - Howard Johnson is right!).
PR is oly needed when you are trying to sell something (or trying to dupe people, or perhaps both). The truth doesn't need selling. It could do with publicising however, granted, but if it is to finally get though the legal system (with help from our european friends) then that would in itself generate news. The difference however is that the 'PR' therefore would be a product of the truth being found out, not the cause of.