Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Old Boy, you need to bring along more of that admirable approach when posting here.
1. It was not overt, it was highly confidential.
2. The langusge used was diplomatic ie very clear for busy people.
3. It wasn't an outburst, it was a series of reports compiled by the ambassador's team.
4. The Don is thin skinned so would likely be offended by anything less than praise.
|
So how many FACTS were there, as opposed to unsubstantiated opinions? Eg How would the ambassador know what was or wasn't going on in Iran?