Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
The FACT that he's been charged with murder in the first place demonstrates that there's NO flexibility. There is NO BASIS for the charge, other than he's the White guy. He followed the procedures. Remove suspect from vehicle if "kicking off", restrain (including the neck), ignore false claims of "I can't breathe".
Nobody is giving valid, practical answers to what should've been done instead. The nearest thing to be suggested is that somehow, their guns, batons, and pepper spray(if they had it) were to be of some use. How? Shoot him?  Beat him unconscious? Make him more agitated and disorientated? Eg Post# 797 by Pierre. |
Four men v one unarmed and handcuffed man. Not rocket science on how he could be restrained without killing him!
Let's not forget that the manner in which he was restrained was very dangerous "Someone in that position can draw enough breath to gasp or speak in spurts, but they can't breathe fully, so they gradually lose oxygen and fall unconscious."
https://www.actionnewsnow.com/conten...570850012.html
Like Pierre, I'm at a loss to understand why you choose to defend the indefensible.