View Single Post
Old 29-06-2020, 10:09   #834
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 7,862
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Black Lives Matter

At least I'm the one not simply BLINDLY accepting the garbage coming out, and I'm looking at the actual FACTS and EVIDENCE.

Has ANYBODY SHOWN that the claimed issue ISN'T about the neck?

If it was about the neck, exactly what mechanism was meant to be the actual problem? The Knee WASN'T on the windpipe, as demonstrated by the FACT that he could claim not to be able to breathe a total of SIXTEEN TIMES. Medical FACT. There are TWO Carotid arteries. Even if one of them was blocked off, the other would still be able to supply blood to the brain.
Link
Quote:
In most instances when a carotid artery is completely blocked, the risk of a revascularization procedure usually outweighs the benefit. Fortunately, the brain has great capacity to use alternative routes to provide blood to the area of the brain supplied by the blocked artery. A network of blood vessels at the base of the brain, called the circle of Willis, can often supply the necessary blood flow.
Many people function normally with one completely blocked carotid artery, provided they haven't had a disabling stroke.
The pressure applied to his neck can't have been that great, as he could still move his head, jaw, and shoulder area. He even lifted his neck up slightly.

It is STANDARD PROCEDURE to remove someone from a vehicle, if they are "kicking off". It is ALSO STANDARD PROCEDURE to restrain them. It was ALSO STANDARD PROCEDURE in those circumstances to apply pressure to the neck. The reason for those procedures is PROTECTING the prisoner under a "duty of care". If he'd died as a result of NOT restraining him, they they would've been prosecuted and persecuted for that.

The videos show that he WAS still resisting and moving around. He at NO POINT indicated that if they let him up, that he wouldn't "kick off" AGAIN.

It what way were they meant to prevent him from "kicking off"? No other way of doing it, which is why in ALL countries of the World, the same thing would've been done, and has been done. Handcuffing somebody ONLY restricts movement of the arms and hands. That still leaves a lot more that can be moved around.

Nobody is even trying to answer these questions, other than with "it's not true", or "there must've been another way". You are ALL not bothering to come up with valid, theoretical, and PRACTICAL(IE ones that would work in the REAL WORLD) solutions. people are just BLINDLY following the agenda. Try looking at things in a critical manner as to whether they are true or not. It's called INDEPENDENT THOUGHT.


REMEMBER THEY DIDN'T RESTRAIN HIM, JUST FOR THE SAKE OF IT.

Last edited by nomadking; 29-06-2020 at 10:17.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote