Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Thank you for that, Hugh. The point I was making was that the original algorithm used would have produced a spike, whatever figures you put into the formula. It was either a deliberate manipulation or a crass mistake, but either way, it proves that no-one should stand back from questioning scientific conclusions. They are human to, and can deceive and they can make mistakes.
|
Hugh's quote doesn't support your point though. It talks about refinements based upon more extensive data available now that was not available then.