Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
Here is the official public link to selected upper tribunal decisions. Not all of them are published, and they are relatively anonymised, eg Mr X. It is only when an issue is raised that is thought to be of importance that it may be published.
The older(2015 and before) ones are on a different link and in a different format.
Here is the link to the 2nd quoted decision CH/3295/2012
A rehearing ordered by the Upper Tribunal is not necessarily a sign that the claimant as "won". It can simply be that it was felt that the First Tier Tribunal hadn't explained or explored their reasoning in a sufficient manner. The principal being that the claimant has to have had a "reasoned judgment", so that even if they don't agree with it, they should know why. That is in the DWP rules, and even at the European Convention of Human Rights level(Article 6).
Can't remember any more specific details about the shoulder case to track it down, again. The 2nd case was easier as there was only one listed case of HB overpayment for Islington. |
You said in the housing benefit case they won a subsequent FTT? Is there a link to that? Those aren’t routinely published.