View Single Post
Old 25-08-2015, 23:11   #5153
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 45
Posts: 13,996
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS)

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
Plus what'll happen to VM's own fibre running from Manchester to AmsIX or was that leased?
Leased. VM's only fibre outside the UK is the Sirius ring between Great Britain and Ireland.

Quote:
Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq View Post
In any case that level of reconfiguration isn't trivial, so I'm a little surprised it was "just done" without any fuss.
Far easier than, for example, moving the Telewest AS behind the ntl one and, after that, merging them which was also 'just done'.

This is nothing more than editing an AS macro and some route maps. Looks as though it went slightly wrong, too, given Aorta was taking precedence over VM's own LINX peering for a little while. I guess this might perhaps be due to the pre-existing traffic engineering governing LINX and the TBB route on VM's edge.

---------- Post added at 23:11 ---------- Previous post was at 23:08 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
peering can be worse than 3rd party transit in performance. Depends on how well its managed.
Public peering is purely about cost, not performance.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote