Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Love to see the Business Case ostensibly behind this proposed sell-off.
In order to arrive at a conclusion, normally people would have had to see evidence, weigh arguments, consider pro & cons and decide on best path forward - normally documented and scored against an agreed requirements list; I wonder if this will be available to MPs when they have a vote on this?
It’s stated that by Nadine Dorries that
So we’re going to move from a company that costs the viewers and the taxpayers nothing, and that has in it’s remit to purchase locally produced programmes, to a company that will compete with Netflix which costs just under £16 per month, had £18 billion of debt, and makes most of its programmes in the USA?
It would be interesting to see the evidence behind the statement "government ownership is holding Channel 4 back", considering the Government has no input in how C4 is run (they appoint the Board, but don’t have day to day oversight - or is she implying that the Government appointees are holding C4 back?).
I wonder if that is based in fact as much as one of Dorries recent statements, which was that C4 was in receipt of public money*?
*spoiler alert - it isn’t…
|
Did you hear that car crash when she was called out for the "receipt of public money" line, omg how on earth are these people put in positions of responsibility, it's not like she hasn't got previous form for being completely out of her depth and ignorant of the very position she's attempting to defend, a woefully inept and incompetent individual that should have been put out to pasture long ago