View Single Post
Old 24-06-2020, 21:55   #13
Damien
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,228
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Damien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver blingDamien has a lot of silver bling
Re: Apple to transition Macs to their own chipset

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Peter View Post
If the first release candidates for new hardware are an iMac and the 13" Macbook Pro you would think that there's a more capable processor on the cards to compensate for the performance they would have achieved with the 10th Gen i9.

There's also the Xeon based Mac Pro to replace which was only released a few months ago. Unless it's going to be discontinued yet again.
Developers are under an NDA to not benchmark or report benchmarks from the development units they're getting.

It's possible they are very capable processors and the reason Apple do not want raw numbers out there is they're good enough to depress sales of the existing Mac range.

It's also possible they're very good and Apple doesn't want competitors to react yet. Let's say they clock in at 50%+ improvements over their equivalent predecessors, that would shake the laptop industry and Microsoft will make a much bigger push into ARM than they have done so far.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote