Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
A pretty cynical approach, isn't it, considering this should actually be about relieving absolute poverty and improving lives?
I think that 0.7% could be much better spent.
|
I think it does improve lives, ours! It does benefit countries as well obviously and I suspect things like vaccination programmes have no conditions attached, can't be sure though. I think we should never have set a figure, if we spend 0.7% fine but don't put pressure yourself to achieve a set figure, that's when stupid things happen trying to fiddle figures.