Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Well of course they haven't - they're doing that outside the court, effectively trying to have their cake and eat it. But I maintain that this strategy, of alleging fraud outside the courthouse and then not submitting fraud allegations inside the courthouse, is de facto the same thing. They've had the chance to put fraud before a judge and have repeatedly not done so, despite repeatedly alleging that there *has* been fraud. At some point you have to accept their loud, public claims of fraud have failed. Otherwise, why not present the evidence?
The Trump strategy exists solely to cause the weak-minded to assume there's no smoke without fire, and that there must be fraud because Rudi said so. And, dare I say it, because nobody can quote a judge saying "I find there was no fraud".
|
I agree with most of what you say but would suggest you avoid statements like this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
The argument that the election was fraudulent has now been repeatedly tested in court and found to be false.
|
It is factually incorrect.