Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
I have given the officer in charge until 4pm to re-clarify their position before I publish his initial reaction on the phone earlier today. Given his reaction it would really be prudent of him to get back to me because if I was him I would not want my name on an audio recording saying what he said given the attention this issue has received from the EU Commission. Let's just say his initial reaction was very poor and actually very rude; so he has a chance to redeem himself before I go to press.
Alexander Hanff
|
Did you inform the officer that you were recording the call? If you didn't and make the information avaliable you are breaking the RIPA act 2000 there are exceptions to the act but would you really be willing to run the risk especially as the whole basis of your agrument is based on privacy, does he deserve none then?
Of course I could be wrong and you informed him he was being taped and the officer concerned is just very dim.
---------- Post added at 18:03 ---------- Previous post was at 18:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dephormation
How dare you try to put a monetary value on civil rights like privacy.
Article 2: Right to Life
What price would you put on my life? Does that mean we shouldn't investigate murders if people of 'insignificant value' are killed?
Article 4: Slavery
Self evidently, slaves lives are worthless people. Lets ignore slavery too.
Article 8: Right to privacy
Either I buy my privacy back from Kent Ertugrul, or I get Phormed. So I wrote my own browser plug in, and switched ISP instead.
Pete.
|
I don't think he was and even if he were, how dare you compare people knowing your browsing habits with slavery and murder, a little perspective might be in order imo