View Single Post
Old 11-11-2019, 19:47   #1888
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 7,865
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
That's not my contention at all. My contention is that the UK implementation varies and these are not solely administrative variation. Your own link, posted previously, described the variation as largely administrative.

As you know, largely does not mean wholly or exclusively.
Any chance of examples of those differences and loopholes?
Link

Quote:
The level of revenue accrued to the public purse as a result of the implementation of Article 5 of the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of the European Parliament) is expected to be negligible. The UK already has comprehensive exit taxation rules, and the changes necessary to implement the directive are relatively minor and primarily of an administrative nature.

Article 5 of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive will be implemented as a budget measure in the upcoming Finance Bill. More information can be found in the Tax Information and Impact Note published on 6 July 2018:

Last edited by nomadking; 11-11-2019 at 19:58.
nomadking is offline