Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHanff
I have edited the first part of the article temporarily until such time as I am sure I have the truth on the situation. I have given Kent/BT a right of reply to clarify the issue of the charity ads.
Maybe I was a little overzealous but hey both side have been guilty from that now haven't they?
Alexander Hanff
|
hang on a mo alex, at least you have admitted you "MAY" have made an honest mistake and given BT and PHORM the right to reply,
can't see them doing the honorable thing and coming clean on anything shortly,
so in my eyes (and probably most others ) you are way ahead in both credability and honesty stakes
,
also just seen this over on BT forums, reference your document re 2006 trials
do i detect a softening of the moderators over there? are they doing their own digging and not liking what they find so are now "mildly" sympathetic to us?
peter
************at
http://www.beta.bt.com/bta/forums/th...t=750&tstart=0
We won't be deleting links about or discussion of this document, just like we haven't deleted discussion of any previous documents such as the one published on the Register a few months ago. As long as people stick to our forum rules and guidelines, i.e. keep it civil and don't attack other users, we won't have to moderate any posts.
Community Rules and Guidelines
Thanks
Mark Wilkin
Support Community Coordinator
**********