Cable Forum - View Single Post - President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

**Hugh** · 14-01-2018, 16:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat

Trump is a believer in Sovereign state government. NWO Globalists believe that the Elitists should run the whole world and dictate to all nations policies on laws, and taxes etc. and force world wide immigration. Just like the EU elitists plan to do when Britain leaves

That is why Trump is under such attack; he's blocking their plan, because he doesn't believe in it; he believes in Sovereign state government,

The NWO will arrive at some stage; we're seeing the building bricks currently being laid.

---------- Post added at 23:30 ---------- Previous post was at 23:17 ----------

For brevity, it was not an exhaustive list of things that need investigation.

You can add the Uranium One deal, 'The Clinton Foundation; was it a 'Pay to Play' setup? Unmasking etc.

Fox newscaster debunks Uranium One.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opi...115-story.html

Quote:

The reality, as Mr. Smith and various other fact checkers have by now well established, is this:

The State Department has one of nine seats on a body that advises the president on proposed sales of U.S. assets that could have national security implications. Whether Ms. Clinton actively participated in the deliberations about the proposed sale of Uranium One to a Russian company is unclear, but neither the State Department nor any of the other eight federal agencies involved raised any objections. Had any of them done so, President Barack Obama (and not Ms. Clinton) would have made the call.

The assets of the company included what was at the time 20 percent of American uranium production capacity (now 10 percent), but the terms of the deal do not allow any of the material to be exported. A Russian company may own those reserves, but it can’t do anything with them other than sell them to U.S. nuclear power plants, which mainly get their fuel from overseas anyway.
Nearly all of the donations to the Clinton Foundation in question came from one source, Frank Giustra, who founded a Canadian uranium company that later merged with Uranium One. He divested from the company in 2007, well before Ms. Clinton was named secretary of state and even longer before the company’s sale was proposed.

So, in a nutshell, the implication that Ms. Clinton allowed the Russians to take 20 percent of America’s uranium as a payback to a major Clinton Foundation donor is, in pretty much every element, flat out wrong. Mr. Smith pointed that out methodically and dispassionately, and now he’s getting no end of grief for it, with Fox News viewers taking to Twitter to accuse him of broadcasting fake news, being a closet Democrat or (horrors!) belonging on CNN, not Fox. (Have no fear, Fox viewers, Sean Hannity was back at it that night with a weird flow chart connecting Hillary with Vladimir Putin and proclaiming the whole matter a textbook case of “pay to play.”)