Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Dude ... just accept you’re wrong. The Supreme Court is the last word on what the law means. It has looked at how Uber operates and says British law means Uber is the drivers’ employer. You can repeat your opinion until you’re blue in the face but that’s all it is - an opinion. And now it’s an opinion without any basis in fact, because the Supreme Court has made findings of fact.
The only way for Uber to *not* be their drivers’ employer in the UK is for Parliament to change the law.
|
1) I merely stated undeniable facts. You can't argue for a case X using reasons A, B, etc when those same reasons also apply elsewhere. I can well imagine that is a basic legal principle.
2) What "law" created them as employees in the first place. There wasn't one.
No doubt the drivers will be whining about what is to come. They won't able to work anywhere else at the time. They will have to be available throughout those
fixed hours, not just when they feel like it or are not doing other work.