View Single Post
Old 18-12-2003, 00:28   #62
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Militant cyclists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
This is a total non-sequitur. Please stick to the subject.
Appologies, I thought you were talking about cycling as being a valid alternative to driving.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
I refer you to Basa's message about the mounted police above!
Cool, so I can speed cos I've seen police cars doing the same? Alas, I fear it wouldn't stand up in court.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
A flashing light is more noticable than a solid one. That is why car indicators flash.

A flashing light with sufficient "latency" that it does not have a distinct "off" phase on a bike is noticable and not difficult to track. I know, I've seen both.
You mean ones which I mentioned, which are constantly on, but increase their brightness instead of flash?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
I don't want to "get worked up about it", however using expressions such as that are not helping the "I'm trying to be reasonable and grown up about this" image you seem to be trying to project here.

Next time, why not just avoid using the expressions in the first place?
Graham.... no wait, I'm not going to bother in case you read it in a negative light
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote