View Single Post
Old 17-12-2003, 22:01   #51
Paul
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Admin
 
Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 63
Services: IDNet FTTP (1000M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 30,567
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Paul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered starsPaul is seeing silvered stars
Re: Merged - Port blocking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dooby
Other viruses do use other vulnerabilities in other services ( 137 for example is one of the filesharing ports, which also has similar vulnerabilities ) but they are not variants of blaster, they are different viruses, ok, I maybe splitting hairs, but claiming that blaster can spread using different ports is just wrong.
There is no filesharing on port 137 - it is the NETBIOS Naming Service.
__________________

Baby, I was born this way.
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote