Thread: BB in Beds area = awful
View Single Post
Old 03-12-2003, 21:32   #15
Neil
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,058
Neil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze array
Neil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze arrayNeil has a bronze array
Re: BB in Beds area = awful
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkiely
strike-a-light!!!!!!! £35 per mth, total bill lthis mth £109 for this?????

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 22:26:00 UTC
1st 128K took 7070 ms = 18539 Bytes/sec = approx 154 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 10605 ms = 12359 Bytes/sec = approx 103 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 8112 ms = 16158 Bytes/sec = approx 134 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 9884 ms = 13261 Bytes/sec = approx 110 kbits/sec


I'm too polite to say what I think!

ntl, wake up to yourselves!
http://forum.nthellworld.co.uk/showp...78&postcount=1
Neil is offline   Reply With Quote