Thread: BB in Beds area = awful
View Single Post
Old 03-12-2003, 21:28   #14
tkiely
Inactive
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Asleep down in the server room
Age: 61
Posts: 516
tkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to alltkiely is a name known to all
Send a message via MSN to tkiely
Re: BB in Beds area = awful
strike-a-light!!!!!!! £35 per mth, total bill lthis mth £109 for this?????

Wed, 3 Dec 2003 22:26:00 UTC
1st 128K took 7070 ms = 18539 Bytes/sec = approx 154 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 10605 ms = 12359 Bytes/sec = approx 103 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 8112 ms = 16158 Bytes/sec = approx 134 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 9884 ms = 13261 Bytes/sec = approx 110 kbits/sec


I'm too polite to say what I think!

ntl, wake up to yourselves!
tkiely is offline   Reply With Quote