Quote:
|
Originally Posted by erol
Suggesting that an NTL executive has broken the law and failed to perform his legal duty to shreholders, by awarding contracts to 'favourites' is potentialy libelous if this is not the case. To suggest such based on the sole 'evidence' of the contract going to India and the exec having a 'foreign' sounding name is not just potentialy libelous, it is deeply offensive imo.
|
Mmm. I agree with you, perhaps Kitty's comments weren't the best comments to make.
I personally do not think this contract going to a company in India is anything underhand/illegal or to do with anyone with a "foreign" sounding name. That is silly.
It's about greed, pure and simple. And NTL are not alone in doing this. Unfortunately, it is currently allowed. I believe it should not be, or at least the company doing this should be hit in the pocket in an attempt to dissuade it.
If NTL (and others) were not making UK call centre staff redundant, it wouldn't be an issue.