Thread: Wind v Nuclear
View Single Post
Old 26-11-2003, 18:32   #20
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 39
Services: Plusnet FFTC
Posts: 4,945
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Wind v Nuclear

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulyoung666
well , if not wind then why not wave , or is that no good as well , probably not , but you would think it would be as the waves are more constant than than wind or are they , somehow i dont think fusion is going to be our saviour somehow , well at least not in the short term , we havent run out of coal yet have we , then why not start digging some more of it , create some jobs at the same time , or is that no good as well , maybe a better idea would be to save energy and obviate the need for more power stations whatever type they maybe
Coal produces pollution and waste too. Entire piles of it that have to be carved into landscapes, they then collapse on people.
downquark1 is online now   Reply With Quote