Thread: Wind v Nuclear
View Single Post
Old 26-11-2003, 18:29   #19
paulyoung666
Permanently Banned
 
paulyoung666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: norton , teesside
Age: 57
Posts: 10,571
paulyoung666 has a nice shiny star
paulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny starpaulyoung666 has a nice shiny star
Re: Wind v Nuclear

well , if not wind then why not wave , or is that no good as well , probably not , but you would think it would be as the waves are more constant than than wind or are they , somehow i dont think fusion is going to be our saviour somehow , well at least not in the short term , we havent run out of coal yet have we , then why not start digging some more of it , create some jobs at the same time , or is that no good as well , maybe a better idea would be to save energy and obviate the need for more power stations whatever type they maybe
paulyoung666 is offline   Reply With Quote