Thread: Wind v Nuclear
View Single Post
Old 26-11-2003, 18:01   #9
downquark1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 39
Services: Plusnet FFTC
Posts: 4,945
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
downquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appealdownquark1 has a bronzed appeal
Re: Wind v Nuclear

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulyoung666
so if fusion is the way to go , is it clean and safe or cleaner and safer ?????? , i must admit to have not looked into it but sitting next to earth's version of the sun could be well interesting couldnt it , ok so wind turbines maybe inefficient , but i reckon they look amazing , there are quite a few near me being constructed and i cant see the problem
As far as I know fusion gives no radiation (but I guess it depends on the method, the one I'm thinking off is what happens in the sun), so if something goes wrong there will be a big bang but no poisoning (just everything in the area getting vapourised ) But explosions = energy so this is unavoidable.

The only other method that could produce more energy is matter-anti-matter reactions -but that's star trek.

Remember all life on the surface of the earth gets it's energy from the sun - so what better than lots of little suns.
downquark1 is offline   Reply With Quote