Quote:
|
Originally Posted by towny
All the points you make are perfectly valid, except for the bit where you say I 'glorify Bush'. This is not true. The only words in the post you quoted which are in any way pro-American are 'an evil situation existed in Iraq which has now been dealt with'. It's an observation you are free to disagree with, but I don't see how you could suggest this fairly mild statement of opinion is 'glorifying' Gee Dubya in any way.
Of course, you, along with both Graham and DQ, chose not to draw attention to the part of my post in which I said:
It's beginning to appear that even an attempt to be balanced is not good enough in this thread.  |
The glorify bush bit was intended in general not as a direct reference to yourself.
EDIT original post now edited to make that clear EDIT
I realised that you were trying to offer a balanced argument, I simply wished to point out that as honourable as Bushes intentions may have been he simply hasnt delivered.
You say that the evil situation has been dealt with, I agree partly, yes Saddam has no power now, The Iraqi people are experiencing a form of freedom, but Saddam has certainly not been dealt with yet.