Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
I say again (and I said it before as well but you keep ignoring it): 'As I already said, the truth of these matters and the reason for them tends not to be apparent for decades. I am sure that there was a good tactical reason for bombing those dams.'
|
And you can keep on saying it until you're blue in the face, however, unlike the Snark in Alice in Wonderland, what *you* say three times does *not* become true!
We have already *HAD* a decade go by since those attacks were carried out, yet there is no evidence or proof of "good tactical reasons". There is, however, plenty of evidence of the suffering caused to civilians!
How long are we going to have to wait before you grudgingly admit that, maybe, just maybe, there *wasn't* a "good tactical reason" for those attacks?
Quote:
Exactly what words am I 'twisting' and how????
|
You asked me: "Are these the dams you are talking about Graham" when it was blatantly obvious to anyone who had actually bothered to read the links I'd posted, that they were most certainly *NOT* the dams I was talking about.
You tried to undermine my point about the US bombing dams and water and sewerage treatment plants by making an *irrelevant* one about the dams built to destroy the Marsh Arabs' habitat which had nothing to do with the subject, but you tried to twist the meaning to seem that I was in the wrong.
You failed.