Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gogogo
Congratulations on summing up your own attitude, couldn't have put it better myself.
|
Oh dear, now you bring this discussion to the level of the playground!
See that pile of poo? That's you, that is! That's your argument!
Yawn.
Quote:
|
I detected a rather smug arrogant attitude from you since were literally laughing at the new democracies supporting the coalition.
|
Any such "detection" is purely the result of your own imagination. I did not say anything of the sort, nor would I ever. I would ask you to prove your claim with cites, however past performance has demonstrated that the futility of such requests.
Quote:
|
I suppose would prefer they remained under Soviet influence.
|
Why are people objecting to me allegedly "trying to put words into their mouth", yet don't complain when others do the same to me? Hmm...!
Quote:
|
Some of the key people involved in the proposed demonstrations are members of the Socialist Workers' Party, the various Communist Parties and other fringe hard left groups,
|
Irrelevant, irrelevant and irrelevant. Some of the people are members of (insert ny particular group you care to name here). Whatever particular groups people may belong to has *NO* bearing on the fact that a *lot* of people are protesting because they object to US behaviour and foreign policy. It certainly doesn't mean that they *AGREE* with or *SUPPORT* the philosophiles of the SWP, the Communists or anyone else.
Quote:
|
Certainly, on such ocassions when mob violence has resulted in damage to property and injuring police officers during the performance of their duties and any law abiding citizen then yes protesters involved in violent acts should pay compensation.
|
And any protestors who are arrested and convicted of such acts in a court of law *WILL* pay compensation or be given jail sentences or whatever. This does *NOT* mean that people should, as you seem to suggest, "pay to protest"!
Quote:
|
I have really tried to keep this friendly, I do not engage in personal attacks and will not but I will say that you are arrogant, you are intolerant and indeed you do respond with personal attacks.
|
Unfortunately what is clear is that you have no idea what a reasoned debate is. You confuse opinion with fact, disagreement with intolerance, requests for proof of claims with personal attacks and think that anyone who doesn't agree with you is, thereby, being "arrogant".
Quote:
Do have a nice day. 
|
Sorry, am I expected to read this as some sort of sarcasm?