Quote:
|
Originally Posted by downquark1
timewarrior2001, your opinions seem to be that if it won't do anything don't do it, yet you are willing to argue profusely why it shouldn't be done even though nothing will become of it.
Granted it may not do anything major to help, but for some people it may, so there is no harm in removing it. Which is more inconvenient, editing the law or teachers generations ahead unable to answer childrens quesions?
|
Wouldnt it have been easier to have lifted the law without such a hoo ha?
Nah you see thats not how it works, get as much publicity as possible, make sure the kids ask difficult questions, draw attention.
No god help us if we tried to do it quietly lol.
You do have a point, but as I said I am looking at it and I havent said its a good or bad thing, all I said was whats the point?
I dont want my child to receive homosexual sex ed, *shrug* sue me for it, hang draw and quarter me, I wont apologise, thats my thoughts and beliefs.
I dont think homosexuality is wrong, I also dont consider it right.
I certainly dont htink its "normal" and I certainly dont consider myself to be "normal".
My views dont suite everyone I know and understand that, but hey it doesnt make them wrong. Lifting this clause will make no difference, leaving it where it is will make no difference. Change will occur when people are ready, not when they are told to change.