Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dr wadd
The problem with that article in The Times is that on the surface a lot of it looks well argued. However, I fail entirely to see why the journalist felt the need to bring up connections with Communism. What it does do though is highlight this journalist's agenda, and just highlight the fact that his politics are clearly very right wing. After that bit of irrelevant rhetoric I see no worth in the rest of the article.
|
So, you disagree with it because the journalist's right-wing agenda is different to your left-wing agenda. Fair enough. But what you have completely failed to do is address any of the
facts raised in the article. You can't dismiss them simply because you don't like the politics of the person making them. Either his statements are
true or they are
false. If you believe them to be false, perhaps you could give some reasons?