Thread: ntl:HD?
View Single Post
Old 11-07-2006, 09:06   #24
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: ntl:HD?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Creative

However I have to agree, the muppet who chose MPEG2 over MPEG4 for ntl/Telewests HD offering is a clown. Theres two possible reasons,
1) Cost -The kit is cheaper than MPEG4 stuff.
2) A contract with STB supplier (SA) which they couldn't get out of.

It may have been a combination of the two. NTL were originally going for the Scientific Atlanta 8450 ( http://www.cableforum.co.uk/article/...tas-mpeg-4-pvr ). Although the 8450 no longer seems to the on the Scientific Atlanta site, so it may be that SA dropped it for some reason.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote