Thread: 0.48MB? Should it be faster?
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2006, 09:13   #9
handyman
Permanently Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nr Carnforth
Age: 50
Services: M6 Keele
Posts: 5,462
handyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny star
handyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny starhandyman has a nice shiny star
Send a message via MSN to handyman
Re: 0.48MB? Should it be faster?
Quote:
Originally Posted by neoapple
that ms time is poor! even for a 512kb connection!
Thats the timing for the sample download not the ping by the way
handyman is offline   Reply With Quote