View Single Post
Old 16-06-2006, 16:16   #54
Salu
Inactive
 
Salu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Yorks
Age: 59
Services: VM TV package. VM phone and 200MB internet & slow Tivo
Posts: 2,332
Salu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronze
Salu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronzeSalu is cast in bronze
Send a message via MSN to Salu
Re: The legal system protects our children again! (NOT)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
Does it befit the crime? I have no idea, I wasn't in court and I don't have years of legal training. Neither were the people who drew up the guidelines, which is why I humbly suggest leaving it to the damn judge, that's what we pay him for.

As for the Independent, you've misread them and misunderstood the idea of life sentences with minimum tariffs*. I'd write more, but it would be unfair. Instead, go and read this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/5086978.stm
I wasn't asking you for a legal judgement but if you "felt" that the punishment fitted the crime. You seem very capable of giving your opinion on everything else.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBking
As for the Independent, you've misread them and misunderstood the idea of life sentences with minimum tariffs*. I'd write more, but it would be unfair. Instead, go and read this:
I haven't misread anything. You have misread me. I was commenting on that fact that he has recieved 5 years, whether you call it "life" or not it's still a ridiculous punishment for what he has done. I havn't mentioned anything about a life sentence in this thread....

By the way your posting style can come across as very arrogant, hopefully I am misreading it....?
Salu is offline   Reply With Quote