View Single Post
Old 16-06-2006, 15:36   #52
orangebird
Inactive
 
orangebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Yeah Baby! ;)
Posts: 5,684
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
orangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny starorangebird has a nice shiny star
Re: The legal system protects our children again! (NOT)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBKing
Does it befit the crime? I have no idea, I wasn't in court and I don't have years of legal training. Neither were the people who drew up the guidelines, which is why I humbly suggest leaving it to the damn judge, that's what we pay him for.
If that was your child that had been horrendously abused, what would your opinion on the length of the sentence, takiung into condsideration that he was only reecently freed after sexually attacking ANOTHER child?

Quote:
As for the Independent, you've misread them and misunderstood the idea of life sentences with minimum tariffs*. I'd write more, but it would be unfair. Instead, go and read this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/5086978.stm
He hasn't misread anything - the disgusting pervert COULD BE eligible for parole within 5 years and 3 months. Free to attack another child.
orangebird is offline   Reply With Quote