View Single Post
Old 14-06-2006, 19:36   #41
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: The legal system protects our children again! (NOT)

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlingman
The law is an ass as they say.

The Judge acted in accordance with guidelines, as he must give a third off for a guilty plea and all criminals serving a determinate sentence are eligible for parole after half their time in jail.

Although on the plus side as a life sentence is the highest sanction a court can give he cannot be released until the parole board are satisfied he does not pose a danger.

In this case the judge determined the notional sentence as 18 years, cut it in half to reach the actual sentence and then he was obliged cut this by a further third in view of the guilty plea and then take of the 157 days he had already spent on remand.

F in stinks but the law is an ass.

Notice how Labour (who introduced the guidlines) are trying to blame the judges!
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote