View Single Post
Old 31-05-2006, 15:29   #39
Womble
cf.geek
 
Womble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In A Politically Correct Hell!! Viva La Revolution
Age: 58
Services: 1gig Broadband
Posts: 864
Womble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of QuadsWomble has a fine set of Quads
Re: Banned from flying my Flag

Quote:
Originally Posted by homealone
Thankyou for your opinion of my sanity, perhaps you would like to point me to any references which show where increased wind resistance doesn't cause increased fuel consumption, in order to substantiate that opinion?


As I said, a point you seem to have ignored, I have no problem with people exercising a right to fly a flag in their private car, but I don't see why their employer should pay increased fuel costs for similar use of a company vehicle. Should the employers be prepared to condone it, then I don't have a problem with that, either, I just think as it is their money, they have the right to spend it as they see fit...
I am sorry I started this thread! Had I known what a bunch of sour faced old gits there was here I would have never started it


Homealone. Quote me the differance in fuel consuption for a van with flags and one with out!!! I would be very interested to see the results, no doubt some sado has done the research Pretty Please
__________________
Womble till I die - AFC Wimbledon - Say No to franchised football
Womble is offline   Reply With Quote